beboots: (Default)
[personal profile] beboots
 Another discussion question came up to me today as I biked down to the farmer's market in downtown St. Albert today. I was biking along the river, which has a lovely walking trail... and suddenly, a chain link fence barred my way. Apparently they were doing construction on something in that little valley - I think a sports field of some description. But that's no call to close down about a kilometer of picturesque bike paths! I felt completely justified going down to the river and bypassing the fence. Nobody works on construction sites on Saturdays. 

(Nobody works on construction sites EVER.) 

Anyway, once I'd picked the leaves out of my hair (I had to push my way through the woods to get around the barrier on the other side of the "construction zone" too) I got to thinking about another bicycle issue. 

Should you ride on the road, or the side walk? 

Now I need to preface my discussion here. I'm not talking about bicycle-friendly European cities like Amsterdam, with their bicycle-only lanes and bicycle parking lots and such. I'm talking about Edmonton, which has several dozen (I believe) bicycle fatalities every year because of collisions with cars, that has next to no bicycle lanes. 

(I think the justification is - if the roads are covered with ice and snow for at least five or six or even eight months a year, why waste space on a lane that will be only used during the spring and summer months? HOGWASH, I SAY!)

Anyway, despite the lack of safe bicycle lanes and the preponderance of huge pickup trucks on our roads (thank you, Alberta cowboy hick stereotypes!), there are a few bylaws that insist that bikes, well, bike on the road with all of the cars. 

Now, I can understand disallowing bikes to cycle along the sidewalk of the few very busy pedestrian areas we have, like Whyte Avenue. But everywhere else? Not so much. 

I bike on the sidewalk. Why? Because almost nobody walks on them. A bicycle can more easily avoid a pedestrian than a motorised vehicle can avoid a cyclist. Also, the worst thing that can happen to a pedestrian if struck by a bike? Some bruises and scrapes, perhaps a broken limb. 

Not a crumpled bicycle frame and a swished cyclist, like what happens when a cyclist is struck by, say, a truck. Going at, MINIMUM, like 60 km/h. (Speed limits within the city are 50km/h, but it's a rare driver who actually slows down THAT much.)

Now, why should I be forced to bike along the road with vehicles going at least 50 km/h faster than I do? Legally, they can't pass us if it's a one-lane road. This just causes frustration on behalf of the driver, causing even more danger for the cyclist. Most motorists in Edmonton, at least, don't really know how to share the roads safely with cyclists. (Most motorists in Edmonton are idiots who should never have passed their driver's tests, but that may be a subjective opinion on my part.) 

I'm not just talking out of my rear end, guys. Four years ago, I was hit by a car while biking to work in the morning. I still feel far safer biking on the almost abandoned sidewalks than on the potholed road, plzkthankz. This is a very relevant issue to me. Judging by the preponderance of "ghost bicycles" (bikes painted white and tied to a lamppost near where a cyclist is killed as a kind of memorial and reminder) around the city, I'm sure it's relevant to others as well. 

If the City of Edmonton cannot provide cyclists with a safe bike lane, why can we not legally use the sidewalks? 

Discuss. 

Date: 2010-09-13 01:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anyjen.livejournal.com
I hear you... I don't own a bicycle now, and though I used to own one when I was a kid, I mostly used it to cycle for fun, not to get from point A to point B (I was too lazy).

I now live in a much bigger city than I used to live as a kid, and I once borrowed a bike from a friend. It was supposed to be only for a short period of time (it was to take part on a demostration made on bikes) and entirely surrounded by other bikers, so I judged it safe. The thing is, I then had to return said bike... and face the traffic.

This was at night in a well-lit city, at a time few cars are around, and it was still a terrifying experience. Cars just don't respect cyclists, and though the law in my country forces us to ride close to the sidewalk and step on the curb when at lights, the myriad parked cars makes this impossible. I had to cycle in the lane meant for taxis, and none of them were very happy about it.

Of course, motorists in my city are notoriously bad drivers (the words "drives like a maniac" come to mind often while on a taxi) but I guess if the situation in your city is even half as bad as over here, then I can't blame you for not wanting to ride on the road.

Date: 2010-09-13 01:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beboots.livejournal.com
I totally know what you mean! Terrifying, especially if cars honk at you. The one experience I didn't like while biking in Killarney in Ireland was that one bit where we had to bike on the sidewalk (to avoid biking on a narrow stretch of road by a blind corner around which cars frequently came hurtelling) and got yelled at by a few locals. D:

Profile

beboots: (Default)
beboots

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 456 789
101112 13 141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 03:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios